Showing posts with label Gloria Steinem. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gloria Steinem. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Eve Ensler Comes out Against Sarah Palin



Once again, for the sake of background and context:

The biography of our next author is provided before we give you the article.  When you scroll down, you will first find a biography of Eve Ensler.  If you keep scrolling, you can read her article against Sarah Palin.

Eve Ensler, like *Gloria Steinem*, is a world renowned and respected author and activist who has fought hard for women's rights, women's equality, and more broadly for all human and civil rights for ALL people.


Eve Ensler
EVE ENSLER, playwright, performer, and activist, is the author of THE VAGINA MONOLOGUES, translated into over 45 languages and running in theaters all over the world, including sold-out runs at both Off-Broadway's Westside Theater and on London's West End (2002 Olivier Award nomination, Best Entertainment.) Her experience performing THE VAGINA MONOLOGUES inspired her to create V-Day, a global movement to stop violence against women and girls. Ms. Ensler's performance in THE VAGINA MONOLOGUES can be seen in the HBO original documentary of the play (2002).

Ms. Ensler has devoted her life to stopping violence, envisioning a planet in which women and girls will be free to thrive, rather than merely survive. THE VAGINA MONOLOGUES is based on Ensler's interviews with more than 200 women. With humor and grace the piece celebrates womens' sexuality and strength.

Today, V-Day is a global movement that supports anti-violence organizations throughout the world, helping them to continue and expand their core work on the ground, while drawing public attention to the larger fight to stop worldwide violence (including rape, battery, incest, female genital mutilation (FGM), sexual slavery) against women and girls. V-Day exists for no other reason than to stop violence against women. In just nine years, it has raised over $50 million and was named one of Worth magazine's "100 Best Charities" in 2001 and Marie Claire’s "Top Ten Charities" in 2006. 

V-Day stages large-scale benefits and produces innovative gatherings, films, and programs to educate and change social attitudes regarding violence against women. These include the 2004 documentary "Until The Violence Stops"; community briefings with Amnesty International on the missing and murdered women of Juarez, Mexico; the December 2002 V-Day delegation trip to Israel, Palestine, Egypt and Jordan; the Afghan Women's Summit; the Stop Rape Contest; Karama, and the Indian Country Project. In June 2006, V-Day launched the UNTIL THE VIOLENCE STOPS: NYC festival which invited thousands of New Yorkers to stand up and join V-Day in making New York City the safest place on earth for women and girls.

In 2008, more than 3700 V-Day benefit events - produced by local volunteer activists and performed in theaters, community centers, houses of worship, and college campuses – took place around the world, educating millions of people about the reality of violence against women and girls and raising funds for local groups within their communities.

In 2004, Ms. Ensler’s performed her play THE GOOD BODY on Broadway in NYC and at ACT in San Francisco, and in a workshop production at Seattle Repertory Theatre. This was followed by a 20 city national tour in 2005. In September 2006 Ms. Ensler’s newest play THE TREATMENT , which examined the relationship between a military therapist and solder who was suffering PTSD opened at the Culture Project. Her play NECESSARY TARGETS, set in a Bosnian refugee camp, opened Off-Broadway at the Variety Arts Theater in February 2002, after a hit run at Hartford Stage. Other plays include CONVICTION, LEMONADE, THE DEPOT, FLOATING RHODA AND THE GLUE MAN, and EXTRAORDINARY MEASURES. THE VAGINA MONOLOGUES, THE GOOD BODY, NECESSARY TARGETS and INSECURE AT LAST have been published by Villard/Random House. VAGINA WARRIORS, words by Eve Ensler and photos by Joyce Tenneson, has been published by Bulfinch Press for V-Day 2005. 

Released in late 2006, INSECURE AT LAST is Ms. Ensler’s first major work written exclusively for the printed page. INSECURE AT LAST is a timely and urgent look at how we live today, the drastic measures taken to keep us safe, and how we can truly experience freedom by letting go of the deceptive notion of vigilant "protection."

Ms. Ensler is the Executive Producer of WHAT I WANT MY WORDS TO DO TO YOU, a documentary about the writing group she has led since 1998 at the Bedford Hills Correctional Facility for Women. The film had its world premiere at the 2003 and premiered nationally on PBS’s “P.O.V.” in December 2003.



Drill, Drill, Drill

Posted on the ***Huffington Post*** September 8, 2008 | 01:18 PM (EST)



I am having Sarah Palin nightmares. I dreamt last night that she was a member of a club where they rode snowmobiles and wore the claws of drowned and starved polar bears around their necks. I have a particular thing for Polar Bears. Maybe it's their snowy whiteness or their bigness or the fact that they live in the arctic or that I have never seen one in person or touched one. Maybe it is the fact that they live so comfortably on ice. Whatever it is, I need the polar bears.

I don't like raging at women. I am a Feminist and have spent my life trying to build community, help empower women and stop violence against them. It is hard to write about Sarah Palin. This is why the Sarah Palin choice was all the more insidious and cynical. The people who made this choice count on the goodness and solidarity of Feminists.

But everything Sarah Palin believes in and practices is antithetical to Feminism which for me is part of one story -- connected to saving the earth, ending racism, empowering women, giving young girls options, opening our minds, deepening tolerance, and ending violence and war.

I believe that the McCain/Palin ticket is one of the most dangerous choices of my lifetime, and should this country chose those candidates the fall-out may be so great, the destruction so vast in so many areas that America may never recover. But what is equally disturbing is the impact that duo would have on the rest of the world. Unfortunately, this is not a joke. In my lifetime I have seen the clownish, the inept, the bizarre be elected to the presidency with regularity.

Sarah Palin does not believe in evolution. I take this as a metaphor. In her world and the world of Fundamentalists nothing changes or gets better or evolves. She does not believe in global warming. The melting of the arctic, the storms that are destroying our cities, the pollution and rise of cancers, are all part of God's plan. She is fighting to take the polar bears off the endangered species list. The earth, in Palin's view, is here to be taken and plundered. The wolves and the bears are here to be shot and plundered. The oil is here to be taken and plundered. Iraq is here to be taken and plundered. As she said herself of the Iraqi war, "It was a task from God."

Sarah Palin does not believe in abortion. She does not believe women who are raped and incested and ripped open against their will should have a right to determine whether they have their rapist's baby or not.

She obviously does not believe in sex education or birth control. I imagine her daughter was practicing abstinence and we know how many babies that makes.

Sarah Palin does not much believe in thinking. From what I gather she has tried to ban books from the library, has a tendency to dispense with people who think independently. She cannot tolerate an environment of ambiguity and difference. This is a woman who could and might very well be the next president of the United States. She would govern one of the most diverse populations on the earth.

Sarah believes in guns. She has her own custom Austrian hunting rifle. She has been known to kill 40 caribou at a clip. She has shot hundreds of wolves from the air.

Sarah believes in God. That is of course her right, her private right. But when God and Guns come together in the public sector, when war is declared in God's name, when the rights of women are denied in his name, that is the end of separation of church and state and the undoing of everything America has ever tried to be.

I write to my sisters. I write because I believe we hold this election in our hands. This vote is a vote that will determine the future not just of the U.S., but of the planet. It will determine whether we create policies to save the earth or make it forever uninhabitable for humans. It will determine whether we move towards dialogue and diplomacy in the world or whether we escalate violence through invasion, undermining and attack. It will determine whether we go for oil, strip mining, coal burning or invest our money in alternatives that will free us from dependency and destruction. It will determine if money gets spent on education and healthcare or whether we build more and more methods of killing. It will determine whether America is a free open tolerant society or a closed place of fear, fundamentalism and aggression.

If the Polar Bears don't move you to go and do everything in your power to get Obama elected then consider the chant that filled the hall after Palin spoke at the RNC, "Drill Drill Drill." I think of teeth when I think of drills. I think of rape. I think of destruction. I think of domination. I think of military exercises that force mindless repetition, emptying the brain of analysis, doubt, ambiguity or dissent. I think of pain.

Do we want a future of drilling? More holes in the ozone, in the floor of the sea, more holes in our thinking, in the trust between nations and peoples, more holes in the fabric of this precious thing we call life?

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Gloria Stienem Discredited Palin: LA Times Reader Commentary




The article you are probably looking for: 

*Gloria Steinem Decries Palin: Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Clinton*

Read below for different viewpoint in reaction to Gloria Stienem's article on Palin (link above)



DUST-UP

Where are the pro-Palin feminists?

Amanda Marcotte says it's impossible to be both socially conservative and feminist. Katherine Mangu-Ward offers herself as an example of a feminist who supports McCain's running mate.
September 9, 2008

Published in the Los Angeles Times


Today's question: Could a socially conservative female candidate ever appeal to feminists? Previously, Marcotte and Mangu-Ward discussed Gloria Steinem's comments on Sarah Palin.

Social conservatism harms women
Point: Amanda Marcotte

It's almost embarrassing to answer the question of whether or not a socially conservative woman could appeal to feminists, because the answer is a tautology. The two categories -- social conservative and feminist -- are fundamentally opposed on the basic issues of gender roles and women's rights. The libertarian strain of movement conservatism isn't necessarily opposed to women's rights, but the whole point of social conservatism is to roll back the social gains made by various groups, especially women and gay people. Social conservatives may pretty up their views with language about "life" and "family," but at the end of the day, we're seeing a struggle between feminists and anti-feminists.

The media blitz around Hillary Clinton's campaign left the impression that "feminism" is a movement solely oriented toward electing middle-aged white women into high office. This would lend one to thinking that "feminists" would want to elect Sarah Palin vice president, no matter how bad her policies would be for ordinary women. But that's not what feminism is about. Different feminists have different ideas about feminism, but the core ideas are pretty standard: Women should have equal access to education and career opportunities as men. Women should have the freedom to marry and date who they want and control their fertility. Women should have the same rights as men to live free from harassment and discrimination. Domestic violence and rape are part of a system of violence that contributes to the oppression of women. I've met feminists of every stripe and every description, but they can in good faith call themselves feminists because they believe these things.

The simple measure of one's social conservatism is how much he or she resists feminism and the gay rights movement. Palin rates high on the anti-feminist scale. She opposes not only abortion rights, she is also against giving women the tools they need so they don't have to get an abortion, as evidenced by her support for abstinence-only programs in schools, which discourage students from using contraception. She's extremely hostile to same-sex marriage and domestic partner benefits. There's no reason to think Palin is against violence prevention, but as I said yesterday, she most likely agrees with John McCain that women don't have a right to equal pay for equal work.

The only case in which I can see feminists offering even tepid support to a socially conservative female politician is in the extremely unlikely circumstances that her opponent is just as or nearly as conservative as she is, or if she offers an entire slate of Christianity-inspired social justice programs that would benefit women as a whole. Feminists are not incapable of holding their noses and voting for anti-abortion politicians who are firmly behind education and welfare programs to support families, anti-discrimination legislation and access to comprehensive sex education and contraception. But someone who believes in offering social support, much less offering women so many tools to empower themselves, is not really a social conservative at all. So again, we're at square one. It's categorically impossible to be both feminist and socially conservative.

Amanda Marcotte is the executive editor and writer for the blog Pandagon.net. Her first book, "It's a Jungle Out There: The Feminist Survival Guide to Politically Inhospitable Environment," is published by Seal Press.

The search continues for the elusive pro-Palin feminist
Counterpoint: Katherine Mangu-Ward

Ah ha! A point of agreement between us! I knew we could find more common ground than just non-ironic consumption of cheap beer. 

You're quite right, Amanda. There's probably no such thing as a socially conservative female candidate who will win the hearts and minds of modern American feminists.

Your list of requirements for "good faith" feminism seems fine, and I personally find little to disagree with. And by that definition, it's hard to see where a truly socially conservative gal with a standard pro-life, anti-gay marriage, anti-affirmative action slate might find purchase in the feminist heart for her pointy-toed pumps.

But what I learned at the knee of my 1970s feminist, name-hyphenating, here-honey-why-don't-you-put-down-that-doll-and-play-with-this-truck mother was that feminism is about seeing female humans as more than just uterus-bearing beings. And that's the kind of feminist I have become. Maybe that's why I find all the feminist hysteria around the uteri of the Palin women so confusing. And that's why I don't think abortion should be the alpha and omega of female political discourse.

To me, this means that the kind of powerful woman who inspires a (hilarious) website like Sarah Palin Facts should have some claim to respect from feminists both for her joke accomplishments -- "Little known fact: Jesus has a bracelet that says, 'WWSPD?' " She's a role model! "Sarah Palin can divide by zero." She's good at math! "Sarah Palin's image already appears on the newer nickels." She's on U.S. legal tender! -- and for her real ones.

Truth be told, I haven't been tracking feminist hermeneutics too closely. I'm sure you'd agree, Amanda, that encouraging strong female role models is an important part of feminism. But in a world where mainstream feminists almost unanimously backed Bill Clinton during the Paula Jones scandal and now excoriate McCain for choosing Palin, I'm not totally clear on what feminism entails -- if not simply support for the Democratic Party.

So is a pro-Palin feminist a contradiction in terms? Where might we find such an elusive creature? The Mariana Trench? The Bermuda Triangle? Kicking it with Amelia Earhart and Dick Cheney in an undisclosed location? Oh wait, we have one handy right here: me.

I happen to think Palin's position on abortion stinks. But abortion and your list of other feminist concerns don't come close to capturing all of the issues I care about most -- not by a long shot.

So here's one answer for how a feminist might wind up supporting a socially conservative candidate: Her feminism isn't the most important thing about her political views. If a candidate came to me and said, "I will cut taxes across the board by 50%, privatize Social Security, dramatically reduce regulations on businesses and push for school choice nationwide," I'd vote for her in a heartbeat even if she were a crappy feminist. Palin falls short of this libertarian dream, of course, but you get my point.

Maybe claiming myself as part of the feminist sisterhood complicates things too much. Since you, Gloria Steinem and company have more at stake in holding on to the label "feminist" than I do, and you don't seem to want me in your club, I'll cheerfully relinquish the title for the duration of our Dust-Up.

But if I'm to be drummed out of the sisterhood, then the last, best hope for a socially conservative woman like Palin to win over anyone who calls herself a feminist goes with me. Perhaps you say good riddance to bad rubbish?

Katherine Mangu-Ward is an associate editor at Reason magazine.




Palin feminists
Discuss the second installment of this week's Dust-Up.

Comments will close after one week.


1. If a woman chosen for cynical reasons, who lacks the appropriate experience and know-how, is VP to the Leader of the Free World, the rest of the world will look and and say - "she's only there because she's a woman", not "she's there because she's the best" - and the misogynists will cheer. They will say - "we were right, women are so blind and stupid that they will vote for one 'of their own', regardless of the issues." There WILL be a woman in the White House one day, but Palin is not the figurehead and spokesperson we are looking for.
Submitted by: beatrice
2:39 AM PDT, September 12, 2008

2. I'm actually shocked at how anyone could call themselves a feminist and approve of Sarah's handling. I'm surprised at my own elected official that has agree to be part of a "truth squad". Honestly, while some will say "we've turned a corner". I think there is MUCH, MUCH more to say. Regrettably, we have a long way to go in terms of discourse. I think there's A LOT to talk about, but some of those issues are so "hot" one dare not touch them. If I do talk about certain issues, I'll be labled XX. What I most resent, is MEN handing out the rules of what we can do, say and think.
Submitted by: mavsreader
6:07 AM PDT, September 11, 2008

3. 45. Lauren wrote :45. Could you please stop writing that Sarah Palin is against sex-education. She supports it as Governor and has funded it." Governor Sarah Palin supports abstinence as the only form of sex education (source). She does not promote nor has she funded sex ed programs that discuss contraception. http://eagleforumalaska.blogspot.com/
Submitted by: elizabeth
8:49 PM PDT, September 10, 2008

4. The world according to Sarah Palin: If you are raped or molested by a family member, you must have the baby. Abortion is not an option. If childbirth threathens your life, you must have the baby. Abortion is not an option. Explain to me again how Palin is a "feminist"?
Submitted by: Elizabeth
8:39 PM PDT, September 10, 2008

5. These people are the same idiots that voted for GWB
Submitted by: hottopics
4:58 PM PDT, September 10, 2008

6. I do not like Palin ,in particular because of her lack of knowledge on enviornmental issues,Her disrespect of animal life (unless it is human). Her very sneaky secretive self. Who is she really? She needs to speak the truth now. Unfortunately I will not buy what she says there is alot to read between the lines that I do not think she will ever reveal. Just an observation. By the way Palin- wolves have families that you want to destroy. Double standards do not cut it with me.
Submitted by: Terri
3:29 PM PDT, September 10, 2008

7. Katherine, How can you say you are a feminist and not be in favor of equal rights and equal pay?!? Being a feminist is not just about reproductive rights, that is true, but Palin has self-promoted herself as a baby making machine. And while she's out there preaching about abstinence she needed to be giving condoms to her daughter because she obviously does not care enough about her family unless they win snow machine races or join the army. I heard her opening speech where she praised her son and husband and barely mentioned her daughters names. What's that about? Palin IS NO Hillary!! Palin is the anti-Hillary.
Submitted by: Not for equal rights and equal pay??
2:24 PM PDT, September 10, 2008

8. Katherine, your lack of support for reproductive rights trumps everything. If a woman can't control her own body and we turn the clock back 35 years, she is done, done, done. But I doubt if you remember those days, or if you can relate to a pregnant 16 year old, who had to go to Tijuana for an abortion? In 1961, that girl was me, so I know. If or when Roe v Wade is overturned, remember this: No matter what you do, there will always be an unwanted pregnancy leading to a back alley and/or a coathanger, or for rich women, a flight to Sweden.
Submitted by: Bonnie Ann Baker
12:51 PM PDT, September 10, 2008

9. i'm voting for mccain/palin because i'm sick of obama's double standard and pretending that hillary was on his 'short list' for VP only to see he didn't even vet her. Why isn't gloria steinem, NOW, and Emiliy's list OUTRAGED at the democratic party for by-passing the BEST woman candidate in history? They chose the unqualified, inexperienced male over the woman and then didn't even put the woman on the ticket!!! WHERE are the outraged feminists on this one?
Submitted by: hillary supporter 4 palin
12:37 PM PDT, September 10, 2008

10. My take on Sarah Palin is that she is a female George Bush. A kind of "My Way or the Highway" mentality. And we all know where that kind of leadership took us. We don't need another pitbull whose religious viewpoints affect her judgment. I think she believes that "God is on her side and not yours because I have this divine connection and you don't, because you might be a jew, muslim, athiest or other more liberal christian;" consequently justifying her decision making. I do not sense a lot of "heart" in her presentations just an ordinate need to win at all costs. Personally, I think she is dangerous.
Submitted by: ab
11:54 AM PDT, September 10, 2008

page 1 of 6
1   2   3   4   5   6
Next >>