Wednesday, April 29, 2009

EASY ACTIVISM FROM YOUR DESK!: Healthcare Reform NOW! - for OUR future!!

Lack of knowledge on what a healthy diet consists of (therefore eating unhealthily) combined with lack of visits to the doctor due to lack of insurance, etc. to intervene before cholesterol levels get too high = artery cloggage = heart attacks = premature, unnecessary and painful death for many Americans

Dear Public,

Right now there are 2 major policy areas up for BIG reform right now that are crucially in need of reform.  This blog post is specifically on HEALTHCARE REFORM and seeks to get you up to speed with info about Obama's healthcare reform plan, why policy changes are needed NOW,  and to give you EASY methods by which you can get involved, starting with getting educated on what's going on.  You being a knowledgeable and proactive citizen is KEY to the health of the American populace! 

Healthcare policy:

The articles below have been included to give you a start on researching healthcare reform issues and Obama's plan and what it means.  To be active, do your research, think about the issues from a broad perspective (minus outdated and besides-the-point talk of socialism -- the US has been investing in the 'social' sphere for a while now), then call or email your local congressperson and tell them what you think.  You can find out how do to do that by clicking: HERE. You need to type in your full zip code and you can find that out by clicking: HERE

The links below are intended to get you started with providing you information about the need for reform.  Apparently the insurance companies are working hard to block key areas of reform that would make healthcare cheaper for you and me, but which would cost them a lot.  Please feel free to offer critiques or more information about Obama's proposed reforms in our comment box.  Thanks!

Obama's plan 

Forbes Magazine on the healthcare plan 

Democracy Now! 

MoveOn.org - Click on the link below to be active through a click!

Healthcare.change.org

Milken Institute Report on the Economic Costs of Bad Health

This is a site on stopping healthcare reform:



Comment below on one of the sites above.  Guess which one?:

One Response to “STAKEHOLDERS AGREE! (to block reform)”

  1. Mark Almberg
    April 1st, 2009 at 10:43 am

    ‘This is not the place for APHA to be’

    Dr. Quentin Young, national coordinator of Physicians for a National Health Program and past president of the American Public Health Association, has sent the following letter to the executive director of APHA, Dr. Georges Benjamin:

    March 31, 2009

    Georges Benjamin, M.D.
    Executive Director
    American Public Health Association
    800 I Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20001

    Dear Georges,

    I just learned that the American Public Health Association has joined with others in the Health Reform Dialogue coalition to issue a report on health care reform and, incidentally, that the principals of the coalition have been meeting for the past six months.

    The text of the report and the news release from APHA reinforce every fear that I have about the co-optation of the health reform movement by the for-profit, private corporations in our $2.5 trillion health system.

    This is not the place for APHA to be.

    I fear that the private interests are seeking to assert their hegemony via this route. They are taking advantage of the chaotic economy to facilitate the complete corporate takeover of the health system.

    Now is precisely the time when APHA should be leading the way to a single-payer, publicly funded health program, the very program we have supported for decades.

    Sincerely,

    Quentin D. Young, M.D., M.A.C.P.
    National Coordinator
    Physicians for a National Health Program




Cartoon found at: www.naturalnews.com

This cartoon has more to do with a criticism of America's addiction to pharmaceuticals and how this addiction is killing us than Obama's plan, but the cartoon still speaks directly to the market driven health industry business model, put in place during the Reagan era that has led health related companies to go on a money boom over the American people. (Market forces and corporate profits > your health). This is the core of what Obama is trying to reform through his health plan, on which he has had news online since before he became President.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Reader Post: GREEN GROWTH!!!!! ITS EVERYWHERE




Sarkozy turns Paris into the First Post-Kyoto City

French Preident Nicolas Sarkozy has unveiled a brave new plan to turn Paris into the first self-sustainable city. The world's ten best architects from around the world have collaborated to present their plans for more parks, green patches, better mass transportaion systems, skyrails, and even flying CARS.. hmm well maybe not, but still it is a great new move towards our ecologically conscious future. The result has been wildly ambition re-thinkings of that city: Sure the Gare du Nord is beautiful and old and important, but it’s inefficient and should be replaced by a major high-speed train hub, said one designer. Another proposed moving all trains underground, and replacing the land with sprawling parks.

Now lets not get upset now. These ideas are now being carried over to the US. With Barack Obama pressing support for green growth, in Fort Myers, Florida the first fully solar powered self sustanbily city is being built. These homes are not yet inhabited but finally it is being done people!

Babcock Ranch, a solar-powered, sustainable city planned for Florida’s Gulf Coast.

The ranch will create 19,500 homes and 20,000 permanent jobs.  The state’s largest utility company, Florida Power & Light, which has previously invested in local solar projects, plans to build a $350 million, 75-megawatt solar photovoltaic plant with smart-grid technology for the planned city’s six million square feet of commercial and civic space. Other planned features of the ranch: solar recharging kiosks for electric cars; a “dark skies” plan that aims to save energy by lighting up the ground instead of the sky; and rainwater harvesting.

Not everyone has been a fan of the project. According to a 2006 New York Times article, the Sierra Club had initially tried to block Mr. Kitson’s purchase of the 94,000-acre Babcock ranch, on which the city is to be built. A deal struck with the state of Florida carved out 80 percent of the area for a nature preserve, which helped close the deal — and the Sierra Club has since become a supporter of the project.

Babcock Ranch website: 

News Article on Babcock Ranch: 

News Article on Paris Plans: 

Monday, April 27, 2009

New America Article: The Two Obamas






The Two Obamas

Salon | April 21, 2009

Two presidents for the price of one? That was the joke when Bill and Hillary Clinton made their respective presidential bids. In the case of Barack Obama's victorious quest for the presidency, the joke became reality. There are two Obamas. One is the foreign policy president whom America needs at this moment in history. The other is a domestic policy president who has yet to find his way.

In foreign policy, Obama is just the president the U.S. required after eight disastrous years of George W. Bush. In a remarkably short period of time, the president has done much to revive the reputation of the U.S. among its allies and enemies alike. No American president since John F. Kennedy has combined charisma with the ability to inspire people around the world with visions like Obama's call for the ultimate eradication of nuclear weapons.

And talk has been joined with action. Quietly and undramatically, but thoroughly and systematically, the president has repudiated one Bush-era policy after another. The Bush administration was arrogant and unilateral. The Obama administration is modest and multilateral. The new president has signaled a willingness to engage Iran, partly lifted the ban on the travel of Americans to Cuba and, to the horror of the American right, has shaken hands with Hugo Chavez.

Many are upset that the Obama administration won't prosecute Americans who tortured U.S. prisoners during the Bush years for war crimes. But the administration's release of appalling details about the Bush administration's torture methods is the bravest sunshine policy since the Church Committee revealed part of the sordid history of U.S. assassination plots in the 1970s.

Obama's decision to reinforce U.S. troops in Afghanistan may or may not succeed (assuming that we can settle on a definition of success in the region). But like his plan to prudently draw down U.S. forces in Iraq, it reflects his correct assessment that the Iraq war from the very beginning was an unnecessary and costly distraction from the battle against Osama bin Laden's allies and sponsors in Afghanistan.

Then there's domestic Obama. In economic policy, Obama has been as uncertain as he has been successful in foreign policy. His fundamental error was to place National Economic Council director Larry Summers and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner in charge of the U.S. economic recovery effort. Geithner's credibility was damaged by his failure to pay taxes, while revelations about what Summers earned from the hedge fund D.E. Shaw and Goldman Sachs struck many as proof that Obama's team has been subject to what the economist Joe Stiglitz calls "regulatory capture" by Wall Street. The problem is not so much corruption as groupthink. It was never realistic to think that an individual like Summers, who spent much of his adult career supporting the discredited establishment consensus regarding financial regulation and trade, could think outside of a box he helped to build, even if he hadn't been paid handsomely by some of the architects of global economic disaster. And yet Obama, relying on Summers and Geithner, has failed to seek counsel from economists and other experts with alternative views. The assertion that domestic Obama is too cautious, incrementalist and deferential to experts like Summers and Geithner may seem strange, in light of Republican claims that the president is a revolutionary trying to impose European-style socialism on America. Isn't his budget full of bold, sweeping initiatives with respect to energy, healthcare and education? As Talullah Bankhead said on leaving an avant-garde play, "There is less in this than meets the eye." Many of the president's initiatives combine grand visions with proposed changes or appropriations that are best described by the technical social science terms "piddly" and "dinky."

According to progressive economists as diverse as James K. Galbraith and Paul Krugman, the stimulus itself may have been much too small. Obama's grand vision of high-speed rail, on close examination, turned out to be a combination of an old, familiar map of proposed routes with relatively small-scale funding. Other, genuinely big initiatives like a comprehensive cap-and-trade scheme are likely to die in Congress. A cynic might wonder whether the smart people in the administration know this and are treating mere official proposals that fail to go anywhere as sufficient payoffs to important Democratic constituencies like environmentalists.

The truth is there aren't two Obamas, only one Obama in two situations. The very qualities of temperament that are virtues for the president in foreign policy -- caution and a tendency to defer to the credentialed experts -- are vices when it comes to domestic policy.

Obama was right to hold over Defense Secretary Gates and Gen. Petraeus from the Bush administration. These moderate realists had repudiated radical neoconservatism in the last couple of years of Bush's second term. By contrast, Summers and Geithner share many of the assumptions of Hank Paulson during Bush's last few months in office. And Paulson, unlike Gates, did not break with the orthodoxy of the Republican right of the last few decades. On the contrary, despite minimal concessions to the need for more regulation, that market triumphalist orthodoxy continues under Obama. It is as though Donald Rumsfeld had remained secretary of defense until the end of Bush's term and Obama had allowed him not only to stay in office but to continue to pursue the failed neocon foreign policy design.

In January, Geithner ruled out any consideration of nationalization of insolvent banks thus: "We have a financial system that is run by private shareholders, managed by private institutions, and we'd like to do our best to preserve that system." Implicitly, he endorsed the old slur of the right that liberals (in this case proponents of Swedish-style temporary nationalization) are un-American enemies of private enterprise. Summers recently told Time magazine that cutting Social Security and Medicare, by methods that might include forcing Americans in their 60s to work longer, will soon be on the agenda of the administration. The American people voted against John McCain, who idealized markets and spread alarm about entitlements. And they got Barack Obama, whose most important economic policymakers idealize markets and promise to cut entitlements.

In his defense, it might be pointed out that Obama has been on the road. And perhaps this is part of the problem. Obama seems to be more comfortable in foreign policy than in domestic policy, and the adulation that he received abroad even as a presidential candidate must be gratifying. But he can't run for prime minister of Britain or chancellor of Germany, and if his conservative economic team fails to put the U.S. economy back on the track to sustained, long-term prosperity, popularity in foreign countries won't prevent him from being a one-term failure at home. We had a president who did more than any other to achieve Middle Eastern peace and yet was viewed as dithering and incompetent in responding to economic crisis. Barack Obama needs to combine his welcome skills in foreign policy with a yet-unseen boldness in economic policy, if he is to avoid the fate of Jimmy Carter.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Economic Policy: 10 Big Ideas for a New America

Let's Wake Up to what's happening in the world!!!  Let's open our eyes!  Let's do it by putting down our differences and coming together for peace and prosperity!!!!



Below, please find 10 fascinating suggestions of how to renogotiate the social contract in the US.  That is to say, it is 2009 - the last serious remodeling of public investment into the social sphere occured during the last Great Depression, 80 years ago.  

You can link to the '10 Big Ideas' site by clicking HERE.  Also, check out the rest of this organization's site:  NewAmerica.net

We first present some food for thought and points of debate.  Please find the '10 Big Ideas' article below, which suggests ways to redesign how taxpayer money is spent so that all Americans can have a more equitable share of the American Pie of Wealth.    

Perhaps the set of policies suggested by these economists is what would have come out of the bailouts had we given the reigns of economic decision making to economists who spend comparatively more time contemplating the microeconomic need to invest in the People of America and the relationship between micro growth and macro growth.  It seems instead that the various players involved in finding solutions to our messed up economy have instead focused primarily on macrolevel interests, thinking that stopping macro failure by itself will solve collapses at the micro level. For people not versed in economic jargon, micro roughly translates into the economics of you and me, and macro translates roughly into the economics of government economies, big business, and international trade. So this is to say that 'solving the economic crisis' has focused on solving the collapses at the big money level and assuming that this will somehow solve issues of capital (money) scarcity at the micro level.  (Please correct us if we are wrong on any of the point contained in this paragraph.)  

A thought on this issue (up for debate with you) is that perhaps the Obama Administration got the direction of bailout money flows backwards - instead of creating a plan that urgently pumped money primarily into car companies, banks, and the financial sector while passing a set of legislation to overhaul public programs in the long-haul, perhaps the urgent flow of money could have been creatively distributed to the consumer (i.e. the people), while putting in place a long-term plan to overhaul the American economy generally, thereby getting at a reconstruction of the workings of the financial and auto industries. 

Interesting facts: thanks to the US taxpayer's generous bailouts, banks are bouncing back to booming and so are their outrageous executive salaries. What is even more interesting (found in the article that you can link to above) is that banking execs at Goldman Sachs (GS) are earning more than other banking companies. This is interesting considering that the US Treasury Secretary is linked to GS – a fact that some suspect has influenced the Obama Administration's decision to bail out AIG (while letting Lehman Bros fail), in which GS is heavily invested

Finally, while the policies suggested below are fascinating, the debate is (obviously) still open as to whether any or all of these policies would actually be good for America.  Feel free to leave suggestions or ideas in our comment box.   


Executive Summary

Ten Big Ideas for a New America

New America Foundation | February 2, 2007

The recent turnover in Congress, combined with a wide open presidential election cycle, creates a rare opportunity to bring new ideas into the political process. The spirit of this new era will be captured by those-from either party or no party-who embrace innovative yet pragmatic solutions to the foremost challenges facing our nation. We offer this collection of Big Ideas as fuel for an overdue bipartisan debate about how to update our national policies for the common good.

A PDF version of the full report can be downloaded below. To request print copies, please contact us directly. For details on the launch event for this report -- including video of the keynote addresses by Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) -- please click here.

Every Baby a Trust Fund Baby

An American Stakeholder Account (ASA), established for every child at birth, would build a savings and ownership culture in America, promote financial literacy, and fortify the American economy for the long haul. Every child would automatically receive a $6,000 deposit into an ASA at birth-and also be eligible for dollar-for-dollar matching funds for voluntary contributions up to $500 a year. Over time, ASAs will evolve into a broad system of saving accounts that all Americans, and especially low-income Americans, can tap to meet their asset needs throughout their lives, enabling them to invest in higher education and lifelong learning, purchase a first home, start a small business, and build a nest egg for retirement. [More on This Idea]

Mandatory, Affordable Health Insurance

We need both universal health coverage and a more efficient delivery system. These are not competing objectives; achieving each of these goals is necessary to make the other possible. The most promising and politically feasible path to universal health coverage is to make an adequate level of insurance mandatory and affordable for all individuals. The new system would be citizen-based instead of employer-based, thereby making health insurance fully portable from job to job. Once all patients are insured, providers can be expected to assist-rather than resist-the efficient redesign of our delivery system. This will entail an electronic health information superstructure, performance-based payments, and comparative technology assessment that will enable us to buy and deliver high-quality health care far more efficiently than we do today. [More on This Idea]

A Universal 401(k) Plan

For those with access, America's private pension system provides powerful saving incentives: tax breaks and employer contributions, as well as the convenience and discipline of automatic payroll deduction and professional asset management. Unfortunately, this employer-based system covers only half of all workers. Moreover, two-thirds of the tax breaks for retirement saving go to the most affluent 20 percent who would save anyway. The solution is a Universal 401(k) plan. All workers would have the option to contribute automatically to their own plan by payroll deduction-and the government would match voluntary deposits with refundable tax credits deposited directly into the worker's account. This supplemental system would make retirement saving easier, automatic, fully portable, and fair. [More on This Idea]

Tax Consumption, Not Work

For more than 70 percent of American families, the payroll tax is the largest tax they pay. Yet the tax is regressive, inefficient, and insufficient to fund the programs it finances. As a 15.3 percent wage tax levied on employers and employees, it deters job creation and depresses wages at the low end of the scale. By replacing the payroll tax with a national and progressive consumption tax, the United States could stimulate job creation, higher wages, and higher levels of personal saving at the same time, all in a revenue-neutral manner. Families would pay taxes on what they spend each year, rather than on what they earn. Higher levels of spending would be taxed at higher rates, encouraging saving, strengthening the economy, and increasing the overall progressivity of the tax code. [More on This Idea]

An Energy Efficiency Trading System

Reducing the economic and environmental risks of excessive energy use must become one of America's most important national goals. The most promising way forward is to reduce energy demand by spurring a revolution in energy efficiency. Indeed, efficiency is America's largest and most cost-effective potential energy resource. Phasing in tough new energy standards for America's biggest energy users and making energy efficiency tradable-much the way we now trade oil and natural gas-would quickly reduce total energy consumption while limiting carbon emissions. A market for standardized efficiency credits (white tags) will give utilities, builders, and vehicle manufacturers flexibility in meeting strict efficiency goals while stimulating new technologies, creating jobs, and improving the nation's overall productivity and competitiveness. [More on This Idea]

A College Access Contract

America's financial aid system imposes too much debt on college graduates, provides too much taxpayer support to banks making college loans, and demands too little of students assuming them. A new "College Access Contract" would allow low-income students to graduate with zero federal student loan debt-and middle-class students to graduate with interest-free federal student loan debt-if they: (1) work hard in high school to prepare for college-as evidenced by completing a college prep track or scoring college-ready on a placement exam; (2) work or engage in community service while in college an average ten hours a week; and (3) evidence a minimum level of competency in an academic area upon completing college. The program's cost can be paid for by reducing excess lender subsidies and embracing market mechanisms in the delivery of federal student loans. [More on This Idea]

Closing the $700 Billion Tax Loophole

While it appears the federal government will spend around $2.8 trillion this year, there is another $700 billion that is "spent" through the tax code in the form of tax expenditures. This shadow budget represents subsidies disbursed by way of taxes not collected. While politically popular, tax expenditures are an inefficient, poorly targeted, and needlessly expensive way to achieve the programmatic goals of government. Tax expenditures need to become part of the regular budget and appropriations process. They should be dramatically reduced, consolidated, and capped. The result would be a simpler, fairer, more efficient tax code. Equally important, hundreds of billions of dollars in potential savings can be freed up and redirected to meet the nation's most important needs. [More on This Idea]

Universal Risk Insurance

In recent decades there has been a massive transfer of economic risk from shared institutional arrangements, such as unemployment insurance and basic benefit coverage provided by employers, onto the fragile balance sheets of families. Yet public programs have largely failed to respond. "Universal Insurance" is a new response to this growing problem. It would provide short-term, stop-loss protection to families whose income (after taxes and public benefits) suddenly decline by a fifth or more due to job loss or catastrophic health expenses. All but the richest families would be eligible, but the program would be most generous for low-income families. This type of broad-based insurance-covering a range of risks but focused on substantial income drops or losses-would provide a flexible new platform of security in a world of rapidly changing risks. [More on This Idea]

Instant Runoff Voting

Americans want a more representative and responsive government capable of addressing the nation's challenges, yet our electoral system is founded on antiquated practices that inhibit voter choices and encourage a politics of polarization and paralysis. It's time to bring our electoral system into the 21st century by adopting instant runoff voting (IRV). IRV elects winners with majority support in a single election by allowing voters to rank a first, second, and third choice on their ballots. If no candidate wins a majority, and a voter's first choice is eliminated, the vote goes to the voter's second-ranked candidate as his or her runoff choice. IRV encourages more electoral competition, solves the "spoiler" problem, enables voters to choose the candidate they really want, and encourages candidates to win by building coalitions rather than tearing down opponents. [More on This Idea]

A Capital Budget for Public Investment

The federal budget needs to prioritize spending that will make our economy more productive in the future. Yet, over the last several decades, the portion of the federal budget going to current consumption has increased, while that devoted to public investment has declined. As a result, the federal government does not adequately fund either the physical infrastructure or knowledge capital upon which a more productive economy rests. We are underinvesting not only in traditional infrastructure, but also in high-speed broadband networks, in basic science research and development, and in training skilled workers, scientists, and engineers. Just as private businesses and most states use capital budgeting, a federal capital budget would allow us to separate our nation's public investment, which expands our capacity to grow, from our government's current consumption outlays. [More on This Idea]


Saturday, April 25, 2009

Friday, April 17, 2009

Blog Contribution: Unexploded Bombs in the Land of a Million Elephants



Temple in Laos

Cluster bombs inside the bomb casing


Hmm...how do we move this bomb out of our backyard?

This blog post contains a Call to Action to do something about the 80 million bombs, cluster bomblets, etc left in the ground in Laos and Vietnam from the Vietnam war.  We are fighting new wars in new countries and haven't even cleaned up our past messes!!!  This article was written by OIA! contributor Nakhone, an American who came to the US from Laos while escaping the Vietnam war as a child.  He is now working hard to get bombs out of Laos - bombs that are still active and still kill people, 30 years after the 'end' of the Vietnam War.  

In this post you will find :

1.  A song to stimulate and empassion you while you read this post:


2. Links of interest:
2.  A letter to OIA! from Nakhone
3.  Nakhone's Call to Action
4.  Press release for A Peaceful Legacy Campaign
5.  More pictures


And we begin....


Dear OIA!,

It's been a while.  It's nice to receive emails from your lately.  Hope this email finds you well.  

Attached is an article I wrote in support of the launch of A Peaceful Legacy Campaign, which I am the Campaign Coordinator.  I would appreciate you publishing it on OIA!. Also attached is a recent Press Release about the launch of the Campaign in SF this past weekend. 

Thanks!  Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else from me.

Yours affectionately,

Nakhone
Gays United Network
Founder/Community Organizer

United We Can, Overcome We Shall!

www.gaysunitednetwork.org OR http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/group.php?gid=48959723335


Unexploded Bombs in the Land of a Million Elephants 
 
By Nakhone Keodara 
 
I was one of those Sally Struthers’ babies in the Christian Children’s Fund brochures, a young child running around my village in Laos, barefoot and naked, playing in the rice paddies.  One afternoon I was playing by a pond when I spotted a water snake swimming toward me hissing, as if delivering a message.  Running away, heart thumping, I heard a distant buzzing sound from above.  I saw an airplane and a small voice told me that one day I would ride that iron eagle to America--a place my sister Samountha had moved to some years before.  I was probably 6 years old.  That was almost 29 years ago.  It seems the water snake’s prophecy came to pass.  God had answered my prayer that fateful afternoon. 

I am an adult now, a gay man living in the United States (U.S.). I have come to believe that God brought me to this country for a reason--to help with efforts to erase the legacies of war that the U.S. left behind in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War-era.  For Laos, this effort is focused on the removal of unexploded ordnance (UXO), including over 80 million unexploded cluster bomblets as well as large bombs, rockets, mortars, and land mines. This is a humanitarian issue, a social justice issue, as compelling as human rights issues for gays.


The U.S. “Secret War”

Allow me to tell you the story behind this tragedy. While many Americans are aware of U.S. bombing in Vietnam and Cambodia and the impacts of Agent Orange, very few Americans have any knowledge of the massive U.S. air campaign in Laos.  From 1963 to 1974, the U.S. military waged a secret war against Laos, a neutral country, during the Vietnam War-era. Laos has the terrible distinction of being the most bombed country in the history of the world. The U.S. dropped over two million tons of bombs in 580,000 bombing missions on Laos. This is the equivalent to one planeload of bombs dropped every eight minutes, 24 hours a day, for nine continuous years. (for more information visit: www.legaciesofwar.org)

For the first time, the U.S. used cluster bombs extensively. Large cluster bomb casings released 600 to 700 small bomblets--the size of a soup can or orange--over wide areas, frequently missing intended military targets and killing nearby civilians. Of the 260 million bomblets, or “bombies,” as the Lao call them, at least 30 percent did not explode, leaving close to 80 million bomblets littering the Laotian countryside. In Laos the majority of people are subsistence rice farmers, dependent on farming to feed their families. With over 50 percent of the land contaminated with UXO, people must risk their lives to farm in order to feed their families. Since the end of war in 1973, over 34,000 civilians have been killed or injured by UXO, primarily cluster bombs. Every year at least 350 new casualties occur.  


Memories of Bombs 
 
For several years after the end of the civil war in Laos, conflict continued between Laos and Thailand.  It was during this time that I too experienced the horror of bombs falling during an attack by the Thai Air Force.  I still recall my mother waking us up in the night.  We could hardly make out what she was telling us as she screamed through her tears for us to hold onto each other’s hands.  The ground was trembling as we ran through the woods, fumbling, crouching down to hide beside bamboo stands as explosions flashed all around us from the bombs being dropped.  Flares shot up as high as the tallest trees and lit up the night sky with blinding brilliance.  We would hide in ravines or in water ditches beneath roads.  Eventually we made our way to the nearest village, where strangers would take us in and let us sleep under their houses. 


The Escape 
 
Like close to 750,000 other Laotians who fled Laos after the war, my family escaped in 1984.  My father had been in the Royal Lao Army and feared punishment by the now communist government.  He  envisioned a better future for us in America.  In the night, a family of eight packed into a rowboat crossing the Mekong River heading for Thailand.  Halfway across my mother prayed to the spirit of the Serpents to save our family from drowning.  The boat was filling with water.  In desperation, we turned around and head back to the Laotian shore, risking capture and execution by the government Border Patrols.  Our boat sank after we hit the riverbank, but we all jumped out to safety. We huddled in the bamboo stands shivering for about an hour before a second boat was fetched to take us on our way.  The stakes were high, but all we wanted was freedom and an opportunity to pursue the American dream!


A Cry for Help -- A Plea for Justice 
 
The untold human toll--the horror and emotional devastation for war survivors--is unspeakable. In her article, “Drawing the Future from the Past,” published on December 5, 2008, on Foreign Policy In Focus.org, Channapha Khamvongsa, Executive Director of Legacies of War, wrote, “Between December 1970 and May 1971, Fred Branfman, an American, and Boungeun, a Lao man, collected illustrations and narratives in the Vientiane refugee camps, where bombing victims fled. The drawings and narratives represent the voiceless, faceless, and nameless who endured an air war campaign committed in secrecy. Drawn in pencil, pens, crayons, and markers, they are raw and stark, reflecting the crude events that shaped their reality. The simplicity of the narration and drawings emphasize the illustrators' identities as ordinary villagers who bore witness to a devastating event.”

The collected illustrations were set aside after the war ended.  As fate would have it, these cries for help and pleas for justice resurfaced through a chance meeting between Ms. Khamvongsa and Institute for Policy Studies director John Cavanagh.  Mr. Cavanagh had kept the drawings for over 25 years, knowing that someday there would be an important place for them.  When he met Ms. Khamvongsa, he returned the illustrations to the Lao community. These drawings were the impetus for the Legacies of War project, founded in 2004.  Since that time, these stories of devastation, loss, and injustice have been told to thousands of people across the U.S.


The Slow Pace of Removing Bombs 
 
Since 1993, the United Nations Development Program and 18 countries, including the U.S., have provided funding to Laos for the removal of cluster bombs and other UXO. The Lao government and a number of nongovernmental organizations have made modest progress in clearing contaminated lands. However, given the current level of funding and the extraordinary scale of the contamination, it will take decades before land in populated areas is cleared and safe once again. Laos desperately needs substantial increases in funding to clean up the mess that the U.S. left four decades ago.


Why Now? 
 
The Laotian Diaspora has come of age.  And we have been caught up in the Zeitgeist that change has come to America.  After our parents escaped from Laos, they endured the trauma of settling in a foreign land and the ensuing struggles to survive.  They couldn’t afford the luxury of looking back and examining what they left behind.  In this transition to a new life, much has been lost to the next generations.  Now, my generation is trying to understand who we are as a people and where we came from.  We want to preserve our Lao traditions and culture.  In the search to integrate our heritage, we’ve discovered the terrible secrets and history of Laos that begs to be revealed and reconciled, so the Lao people can move on to a brighter future.  One might say, it was 40 years ago.  Why dwell in the past?  But our argument is that 40 years of death and injury to innocent lives is enough!  
 
In this Age of Obama, we expect accountability for our actions, responsibility for our mistakes, and hope for justice.  Let us relinquish our legacies of war so we can impress on our children a legacy of brotherly love, peace, and human compassion. 
 
I am speaking as a concerned citizen of the world, as an American resident, and as someone with roots in Laos.  This is a story whose time has come--a call to action for the Laotian Diaspora all across the United States and abroad.  On a basic human level, we cannot let the voiceless be silenced, the nameless forgotten and the faceless forever erased from history. We must not let the desperate cry for help and a plea for justice, for hope and for peace of those innocent villagers, whose suffering has echoed down across four decades, go unanswered.  Their stories will be told.  Are we listening America?  We can do better.  Yes we can! 


We Need Friends 
 
Laotian Americans need friends and supporters.  Any movement for social justice cannot obtain its objective by acting alone, whether it is the Gay, Cambodian, Vietnamese, Latino, African-American or Laotian American community.  So, as a gay man, I am advocating that the Gay community align itself with Lao Americans to form an unlikely coalition for mutual benefits.  Gays need allies to support gay issues and Lao Americans need support in getting funding to remove UXO from Laos.  I believe that building bridges to the Lao community would benefit the Gay community, especially in California as there is a huge Lao American population in key cities like San Francisco, San Diego and Fresno.

Other oppressed communities should coalesce with Lao Americans to flex our collective political muscle and exercise our voice to be included in the Zeitgeist of Obama.  We must ride the tide of change that has swept across America and the world.  Cambodians and Vietnamese should join our efforts to rid Southeast Asia of any traces of Agent Orange as well as UXOs.  Latino Americans can benefit from this new alliance in their fight for immigration reform and African-Americans can expand their political reach by aligning themselves with a new political voice.

In my search for justice, I have come to find that it is not a matter of settling the score but of finding common ground as spiritual beings sharing a common human experience.  It requires that we practice radical forgiveness, both for ourselves and for others, in order for true justice to be served.

The U.S. inflicted a huge injustice on tens of thousands of innocent civilians in Laos.  The time has come to make amends.  The very least the US can do is to fully fund UXO removal and victim assistance. For the past 13 years the U.S. has contributed on average $2.9 million per year for UXO removal, however, the U.S. spent $2 million a day for nine years to bomb Laos.  Legacies of War has asked the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs to increase funding for Laos to $6 million for FY2010. The Lao PDR government and the United Nations Development Program estimated that it will take $73 million over three years to fund the removal of UXO on high priority lands and provide victim assistance. The U.S. should provide a sustained funding program to achieve these goals. Only then can America truly achieve reconciliation and live up to President Obama’s commitment in restoring US moral leadership in the world.

Won’t you help both Laotians and Americans complete the journey of reconciliation and forgiveness?  Only then can we heal the wounds of war and have hope for a better tomorrow! 

I believe that America is a great country and her citizens are capable of much love for their fellow human beings.  The whole world witnessed the great depth of compassion that poured forth in the aftermath of horrendous tragedies like 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, the Indonesian tsunami, and, most recently, the China earthquake.  
 
I implore the American public to find its compassion once again for the people of Laos!  What you can do to help:  Write, call, or email your representatives in Congress, or sign the petition at  http://
act.legaciesofwar.org urging Congressional members to vote for the increased funding for Laos in FY 2010.  And encourage your friends and family to do this as well. Together, we can make a difference.

 
Nakhone Keodara is the Campaign Coordinator of A Peaceful Legacy: Petition to Remove Bombs from Laos, and sits on the Advocacy Committee of Legacies of War.  He is a community organizer and founder of the Gays United Network based in Los Angeles, California.
 



A Peaceful Legacy Campaign Press Release LOW Press Release-A Peaceful Legacy Campaign FINAL Obama IS America!



Bombs, bombs, bombs


Bombs and babies...